Let’s instead guess the plaintext language is Arabic in Latin script, cipher is ROT1 (A→B). Then to decode, shift back 1:
Let’s try on “ly” = “my” (l→m, y→z: “mz” no).
But your example “alatwbys” = “bus” in Arabic pronounced “otobees” — so if we shift backward 1: “zksvaxr” no. Maybe it’s a Caesar shift of +1 on English letters that represent Arabic sounds: Download- byhss ly tyz mhjbt msryt fy alatwbys...
“ly” → shift back 1: kx → not clear. Try reverse: If plaintext Arabic in Latin is “msryt” → معرب? No. Let’s try: “mhjbt” might be “mikbāt” but not obvious.
Given the structure and “fy alatwbys” → “في الأتوبيس” (in the bus) — that’s Arabic, but letters are shifted: “alatwbys” — shift back 1 letter → “zksvaxr” no. But “alatwbys” in Arabic script is الأتوبيس, but if each Latin letter is shifted by +1 from original Arabic Latin script? Let’s instead guess the plaintext language is Arabic
decodes (with shift -1) to: “Download- axgrr kx sya lgias lrqxh ex zksvaxr” — not readable.
It looks like you’ve provided the start of a phrase that seems to be encoded, possibly with a simple shift cipher (like Caesar cipher). Maybe it’s a Caesar shift of +1 on
Given the lack of clear solution in 1 minute, a likely intended completion could be: