But someone else is there. A third student, or perhaps a security guard with a cracked-screen smartphone, films them from a distance of fifteen feet. The footage is shaky, poorly lit, and silent. It captures nothing explicit—just two people in close proximity. But the caption, when it is uploaded to a private Telegram group called “DU Fails” or an Instagram hate page named “Delhi’s Ugly Truth,” supplies the missing narrative: “Shameless in college library. This is what our campuses have become.”
It begins, as these stories often do, in a liminal space of a North Campus college—perhaps Miranda House, perhaps Ramjas, perhaps a staircase near the Arts Faculty library. The time is always “after hours,” when the fluorescent lights of the corridor cast a sickly yellow glow. A boy and a girl, both around nineteen, sit close. Their crime? A hand resting on a knee. A whispered joke that leads to a laugh. A kiss on the cheek that lasts a second too long.
She vomits. Then she deletes her Instagram, her Facebook, her Twitter, her Snapchat. But the video is already archived on a dozen “meme pages” that specialize in leaked college content. It will never be deleted. But someone else is there
A small group of students—mostly from Left-affiliated unions—holds a silent protest outside the college gate. They hold placards: “Your Shame is Not Our Problem,” “Punish the Filmer, Not the Filmed.” Thirty people show up. A Right-wing student group holds a counter-protest with placards: “Indian Culture = Discipline.” The police separate them. By evening, both groups have gone home. The news cameras leave.
By noon, the Delhi University administration issues a statement. It is careful, bureaucratic, and utterly useless: “We have taken cognizance of the matter. The college’s internal committee will investigate the conduct of the students involved. Any violation of the university’s code of conduct will be dealt with strictly.” It captures nothing explicit—just two people in close
The girl, let’s call her Meera (not her real name), finds out about the video when her mother calls her, weeping. Her mother has received the video from her own sister, who received it from a neighbor, who received it from a WhatsApp group for “respectable families.” Her mother asks only one question: “Beta, is this you?”
The phrase “code of conduct” implies that what happened was a breach of rules, not a breach of privacy. The college principal, a woman in her sixties, calls for a “special meeting” of the Discipline Committee. No one asks who filmed the video or why it was shared. The time is always “after hours,” when the
A week later, the video has been forgotten by the algorithm. It is replaced by a new viral video: a fight between two auto-rickshaw drivers in Ghaziabad. Meera and Arjun become a footnote, a cautionary tale that college seniors tell freshers during orientation: “Don’t do anything in public. Someone is always watching.”
Two days later, the discourse begins. It is its own kind of viral contagion.